Death Of A Salesman Essay Assignment

Essay/Term paper: Death of a salesman essay

Essay, term paper, research paper:  Death of a Salesman

See all college papers and term papers on Death of a Salesman

Need a different (custom) essay on Death of a Salesman? Buy a custom essay on Death of a Salesman

Need a custom research paper on Death of a Salesman? Click here to buy a custom term paper.

Death of a Salesman Essay

December 9, 1996

Willy Loman is responsible for his own downfall. Willy finds his own hero and tries to become the hero in his own existence. Willy tries to become a very successful businessman, at the start of his career he thinks that no one can tell him what to. Willy is not good with people, he is good with his hands, he is not a good salesman and he chooses the wrong career. Willy often makes up stories or changes the stories he knows because he cannot face the truth of his life that he has not accomplished as much as he has planned. Willy's downfall is his own doing which is brought about by his unrealistic dreams, his pride, his career choice and his failure to manage life's problems.

Willy, at a young age, noticed an old salesman who worked at an age of 80 and made a lot of money. The old salesman took orders from no one, he made his own orders and everyone did as the old man said. When the old salesman, Dave Singleman dies, all the buyers came to his funeral. All the people Dave ever knew came. There were thousands mourning his death. From that point, Willy Loman found an awesome dream which he followed the rest of his life. Willy became a salesman. Willy is the most unqualified salesman ever! He never sold a thing. Willy stops seeing the truth at one point of his life and he relies on his own lies to numb his pain. The pain of knowing he cannot and wont be able to become Dave Singleman. He is Willy Loman, who is good at fixing the house. He is not cut out for travelling from city to city and selling goods to people he has never met before. Willy dramatically dies living out his dream, the dream that never suited Willy Loman.

Willy does not allow people to tell him what to do. He believes that he cannot be bossed around and that he is too important to fall under anyone's authority but his own. Willy teaches Biff and Happy not to take orders from anyone. He thinks this will make Biff, Happy and himself successful, but it is in fact a major contribution to Willies failure. Willy did not become a "Big Shot" meaning he did not become important to the field of retail. Willy thought he was a "big shot" when he was not and this must have made people angry because he is not liked by many people. People have to earn their importance. They cannot just be important overnight. This lack of status contributes to his co-workers disrespect.

Willy accomplishes less when he works compared to working and staying at home. Willy fixed up his house with great skill and ease. Willy's family appreciates the things Willy does for the house and the family. They share many happy memories of him working on the house. Willy is suited at a job that requires hard labour rather than being a salesman. Biff says in the novel that Willy puts more work in the house than he ever did at work. This is not true because Willy paid off the house because of his job but in a sense it is true because Willy put his whole life into being a salesman and if he put his life into being a carpenter he probably would have accomplished much more than just paying off the house. Thus manual labour brought Willy enjoyment but he rejected it in his pursuit of the American Dream.

Willy Makes up stories or changes stories because his life so uninteresting. He is not doing anything with his life and this depresses Willy. He often says that he will take care of the problem first thing in the morning. When Willy wakes up he intentionally forgets about all his problems and goes on with his life. These problems accumulate until Willy loses control. Willy ends up killing himself because of the overwhelming amount of lingering problems.

Willy Loman thinks he is an important figure but in reality he is an ordinary person. Willy cannot take orders from anyone and this does not allow him to gain respect from others. Willy chooses the wrong career and does not accomplish much during his life because of his poor career choice. Willy Also never faces the truth and blocks out his problems until there are too numerous to handle. These four reasons show that Willy is responsible for his own downfall and ruins his and his families lives.

Other sample model essays:

Death of a Salesman / Death Of A Salesman Vs Hamlet

Death Of A Salesman Vs. Hamlet Willy Loman and Hamlet, two characters so alike, though different. Both are perfect examples of tragedy in literature, though for separate reasons and by distin...

Death of a Salesman / Death Of A Salesman- Willy's Escape

Death of a Salesman: Willy Lowman No one has a perfect life. Everyone has conflicts that they must face sooner or later. The ways in which people deal with these personal conflicts c...

Death of a Salesman / Death Of A Salesman-1

Willy Loman: A Man With A Dream A common idea presented in literature is the issue of the freedom of the individual in opposition to the controlling pressures of society. Willy Loman, the ma...

Death of a Salesman / Death Of A Salesman

Death Of A Salesman The play "Death Of A Salesman" , the brainchild of Arthur Miller was transformed and fitted to the movie screen in the ...

Critical Essays / Death Of An Author-Critical Analases

Token Entry January 28, 1997 Eng 243 -06 Writing Assignment #1 "Death of the Author" The title to the story "The Death of an Author," by Roland Barthes, suggests this story may be a fict...

Critical Essays / Death Penalty- To Be Or Not To Be

THE DEATH PENALTY: TO BE OR NOT TO BE... For the past several months Americans have regularly listed crime and violenc...

Critical Essays / Death Penalty

The Death Penalty The death penalty is a subject that has had much more popularity since it was reinstated in 1976, compared to the years prior. It is a subject that rais...

Poetry / Death- A Common Element In Poetry

Death is a common theme in many poems. It is viewed so differently to everyone. In the poems, "Because I could not stop for Death," "First Death in Nova Scotia," and "War is kind" death is prese...

Emily Dickinson / Death

Many poems are written about death. The two poets William Cullen Bryant and Emily Dickinson were very influential trancendental writers. Bryant writing Thanatopsis And Emily Dickinson's "Because ...


Roughly two thousand and four hundred years separate Sophocles’ Oedipus the King and Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman and yet Aristotle’s definition of tragedy almost fits the two plays exactly with just some minor modifications. Other than these slight modifications, Miller was able to produce a tragedy fit for modern times and the common audience. Aristotle’s definition wouldn’t be appropriate anyway in modern times because monarchy is no longer prevalent.

Need essay sample on

"Oedipus the King and Death of a Salesman as Tragedy" topic?

We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you


What Tragedy is

Aristotle defined tragedy through his work Poetics as:

an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of action, not of narrative; through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation of these emotions (Poetics, part VI).

Our Customers Frequently Tell EssayLab writers:

I'm not in the mood to write my paper now. I don't have the time

Professional writers suggest:

Academic Papers For Students

University Essay Writing ServiceGet Paid To Write Essays For StudentsHow to Make AssignmentUniversity Essay Writing Service

Aristotle emphasized in his work that tragedy has certain elements, plot, characters, diction, thought, and spectacle. Miller followed these points but modified the element of characters to make it more appealing to the modern audience. But those definitions are Aristotle and Arthur Miller being technical they looked at certain parameters and they check if it is found on stories. If one of those elements goes amiss, they would no longer consider a play as a tragedy. Tragedy for me is simply a story that has, well, a tragic ending. Tragic meaning someone has to die or lose a very important body function or part without a reasonable cause for the character’s demise. I would not call something tragic if the character deserves to be punished. Aristotle’s definition is more like karma rather than a tragedy.

Oedipus as Tragedy

Oedipus the King is almost the perfect example of a tragedy, at least for Aristotle. Aristotle probably made his theories on tragedy around Sophocles’ play. Here are some elements that fit Aristotle’s points in his theory of tragedy: The plot – Aristotle said that the plot should follow the rule of necessity and probability, meaning events should not happen with no apparent reason. In Oedipus, events are coherent. Actions are directly related to the previous, starting from the prophecy that was made up to the end. Still on the point of plot, Aristotle argues that the plot should be complex and must have Peripeteia and Anagnorisis, reversal of fortune and recognition respectively. The reversal of fortune in Oedipus is when the messenger revealed Oedipus, out of good intent, that the parents he knew were not really his. Instead, he recognized the whole truth (anagnorisis). Characters should be from noble families to emphasize the downfall that they would eventually suffer from, and this downfall with be because of Hamartia or tragic flaw. Oedipus’ tragic flaw is his innocence. Diction is also an important element in tragedy. Diction is the “expression of the meaning of words” that are appropriate to the tragedy’s elements. Aristotle pointed out the metaphor’s use. Patterns of imagery were used in the play, light against dark, sight and blindness, and illness and pollution (McManus, 1999)

Death of a Salesman as Tragedy

Arthur Miller’s concept of tragedy is pretty much the same as Aristotle’s; they only differ in the nobility of the characters. The main reason why Arthur Miller used a common man is because the traditional “fall of princes” does not appeal anymore to readers. Readers want characters that can they relate to. You don’t get any common than a salesman. Arthur Miller defines a tragic character as “a character who is ready to lay down his life, if need be, to secure one thing--his sense of personal dignity.” And that is exactly what Willy Loman has done in the story. He committed suicide because he realized that his life is useless and his death would give insurance money to his family. Tragedies, according to Arthur Miller depicts the fear of being displaced, the common man knows this fear best. This is shown by Willy Loman’s fear of failure (Miller, 1949)

Difference/Similarities and their Meaning

The main difference between the two plays is the characters. Sophocles used royalty in his play while Miller used the common man. The fact that these plays are over two thousand years apart means that monarchy is virtually extinct. They were used back then because they were still part of the society. Now that the world is dominated by the average man, majority of works done are written for them. Tragedies also happen to commoners, even more often than the non-commoners. One similarity is the use of music, during Sophocles’ time, this was done through the chorus. The chorus was even considered as characters back then, making early plays the earliest musicals.

In Death of a Salesman, though reduced to the beginning and end of the play, the sound of flute playing is inserted. Another difference is the way the protagonists resolve their problems after the realization. Oedipus, who definitely suffered more than Willy, ironically resolved his problem in a less-drastic fashion, he did not commit suicide like what Willy has done. He gouged his eyes out and chose to live in exile. This difference is because the psychology of people has changed. Death may sound harsher than blinding oneself and living in exile but it actually isn’t. Oedipus chose to suffer more so he can pay for his mistakes. The Emotional strength of people then maybe stronger than people today.


A couple thousand years and still tragedy remains almost as it were then. The changes are acceptable since tragedy should also change with the times with the words of Arthur Miller, “It is time, I think, that we who are without kings took up this bright thread of our history and followed it to the only place it can possibly lead in our time--the heart and spirit of the average man.” (The Common Man, 1949)

Works Cited

  • Aristotle. The Poetics. Trans S. H. Butcher. The Internet Classics Archive.
  • McManus, Barbara. “Outline of Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy in the POETICS.” 
  • Miller, Arthur. “Tragedy and the Common Man.” 1949


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *